- 1964-1967 SP400 Parts Images
- How to wire the Switch Pitch on a Buick Transmission
    - 400 auto codes
- BOP Bellhousings and Automatic Identification
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: 71 GS rear... Or not?

  1. #1

    71 GS rear... Or not?

    Can anyone help me identify a rear by the axle tube stamp? I was told it was from a 71 GS, but I'm not positive. The axle tube stamp is LL 00BB. 1006622. It is a posi with an eaton carrier. Any help or information is greatly appreciated.
    -Joe

  2. #2
    I don't know how to interpret that, but, if you look on page 40-79 here:
    http://www.teambuick.com/reference/l...files/40-d.php


    WEBNOTE: When inserting an email in a posting, use the "smilie" @ so that web robots don't pick up your address and send you more junk mail!
    Members can be contacted by clicking on their "handle", but you are much better off to post to the thread!

  3. #3
    weird. my books say there should be a three letter code stamp.

    IF the factory double stamped all of the codes for some reason
    THEN we'd be looking at an 'LOB'

    which in 1971 would decode as

    L == A body, 8.5"
    O == 2.73 or 41:15 Limited Slip
    B == Buick plant

    all Buick A body rears for this year should be Buick built, while a big car 8.5" could come from any of the divisions. all of the big car 9 3/8" rears are Olds.

    not exactly a drag strip gear, but you'd expect a limited slip in a GS or wagon.
    The way to crush the bourgeoisie is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation.
    Vladimir Lenin

    Government schooling is about "the perfect organization of the hive."
    H.H. Goddard, Human Efficiency (1920)

  4. #4
    bad news from the Chassis manual:
    http://www.teambuick.com/reference/library/71_chassis/


    it breaks the rear codes down by engine, trans and MODEL application.

    according to the chassis manual, this diff should be behind a 350ci / TH-350 ... in a 43436.

    which is a Sportwagon.

    otoh, shouldn't a wagon have a leaf spring rear? kind of hard to miss the missing spring buckets for an A-body Skylark / GS.


    never mind, only the Estate Wagon has leaf springs, Sportwagon had coils.

    http://www.teambuick.com/reference/l...files/40-a.php

    something else i'm noticing though, the chassis manual thinks that all Gran Sports had a 455. i'm pretty sure that's not true.

    in fact, the Stg1 registry says that the vast majority of GS production in 71 was Bu 350 powered.

    http://www.buickperformanceclub.com/GSprod.htm
    The way to crush the bourgeoisie is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation.
    Vladimir Lenin

    Government schooling is about "the perfect organization of the hive."
    H.H. Goddard, Human Efficiency (1920)

  5. #5

    LOB yes!

    Bob thanks for the information. I did locate LOB under my earlier noted code. Additionally, I may have misread the code that I initially reported. Upon closer inspection, I found that instead of LL 00BB, it may be LL C0B. On the axle tube, it looks like this:

    LL C0BB 1006622

    LOB

    this is definitely a coil spring rear, and I have seen multiple 350 GS cars.
    Also, you are correct that it is a 2.73 gear.

    I am trying to find new axles for this rear. I was concerned that it may have been an olds rear. Thanks for the help. Curious about your comment, "more bad news from the manual". Was that because you thought it was a leaf spring rear?

  6. #6
    I was concerned that it may have been an olds rear.


    nope, the third letter would be an "O" if that were the case.


    what i mean by 'bad news' from the chassis manual is that a 350 GS would vin code as a Skylark, the Gran Sport would just be an option package on top of that.

    the problem from the chassis manual is that there is only one "economy" option ratio shown for a Skylark / Custom, 2.56:1. "LKB" for peg leg and "LTB" for limited slip.

    the LOB 2.73, according to the book, was ONLY supposed to be in the Sportwagon. unless the GS package was also an option on the Sportwagon, that rules this out as an OEM 'GS' part ... unless you can find an option sheet showing otherwise.

    this was before a lot of computerized automation and a lot of strange things happened that weren't necessarily "by the book".

    but you've already told us this is a replacement rear anyways. just don't try to justify it as 'original to the car' and i doubt you'll have any problems. externally and even parts wise, this rear is identical to what came in the Skylark / 350ci, it's just the gear set and tube stamping that's 'wrong'.

    most likely, the rear will never get looked at unless you're trying to win a concours show.
    The way to crush the bourgeoisie is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation.
    Vladimir Lenin

    Government schooling is about "the perfect organization of the hive."
    H.H. Goddard, Human Efficiency (1920)

  7. #7
    Thanks again for passing along your knowledge. I bought this rear in the middle of the night while it was raining, at a farm 250 miles away from home. I knew it was a posi with bolt in axles, and I took the guys word for it that it came from a 71 GS. I knew it needed to be rebuilt, but thought it would still cost less than having my 1970 skylark open rear converted to a posi. 8.2 parts are not easy to come by, but 8.5 parts are everywhere. My plan is to switch the gears to 3.42's and link it all to a fresh built 455. My car is a keeper. No plans to call it a GS. I just want it to be a nice cruising sleeper. I forgot to mention that it is a convertible.

Similar Threads

  1. 1966 Riviera rear ventilation panel - Just below the rear window
    By BluesBrothersBuicks in forum Body and Paint Shop
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-15-2012, 02:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
TeamBuick.com Privacy Policy