Originally Posted by
lupocamino
Hi Bob,
I have two minds now. On one side it would be nice to have an almost original car from 1952. Except the roof and a new paint all on my "new" Buick is original. So, a straight eight would match very well. If it's a 263 I can also re-use a lot of my parts for the rebuild of the motor.
On the other side, as long as I can't get a good straight eight, why not use a nailhead-engine?
Btw Bob, you are a "Profi". I have an offer now for a straight eight engine, the seller says it comes from a 1952 Special. The engine number is "67012694". Can this be correct?
It also was made for manual trans but I have Dynaflow. Is there a chance to get the engine adapted?
Can you please help me?
many thanks,
WolfAnrufen
SMS senden
Zu Skype hinzufügen
Sie benötigen Skype-GuthabenPer Skype kostenlosAnrufen
SMS senden
Zu Skype hinzufügen
Sie benötigen Skype-GuthabenPer Skype kostenlos
Wulf, If you use a 263 CID straight 8 that has a manual trans style crankshaft, easiest thing to do is rebuild it using the crankshaft from your blown dynaflow equipped engine. So I'd pull the crankshaft out of the blown engine and ensure it's still useable. If not, the manual style crankshaft is much more difficult to convert to an automatic (dynaflow) transmission than the automatic style crankshaft is to manual transmission.
If I were installing a 322 Nailhead in my car, I'd get one from a 1956 Buick Super or Roadmaster along with the Dynaflow that was/is connected to it. Best year for the 322 and best year for a Dynaflow that will fit a 322. The 322 can be installed into your 1952 Super. However, it's not a simple "bolt in" affair. Another upgrade you may want to consider is 1952 - 1955 Roadmaster front brakes. They are 2.5" versus 2" wide.
I'm a member of P.E.T.A.
People Eating Tasty Animals
There's no nookie like chinookie
No butts like halibuts
Fish are not our friends, they're food.
Eat more moose - 10,000 wolves can't be wrong
Life is sexually transmitted.
Bookmarks