From the Reference Section:
- Buick Compound Carburetion
- Buick F-263 Head/Gasket Swaps, effects on compression
- Straight Eight Engine Specifications
-
263 Head X-Sections
    - Building a High Performance Straight Eight
- Buick Straight Eight Lifter Adjustment
- Straight Eight Intake Manifold X-Sections
- Straight Eight Oil Supply Update
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Crank mods

  1. #1

    Crank mods

    I'd like to learn from other people's experience on lightening the stock crankshaft. What works and what doesn't? At some point Allleycat was in the process of modifying his 263 crank, but I haven't heard back. I was able to get a spare 320 short block that I'm going to build for serious power.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    186
    Rep Power
    0
    Jyrki,
    I'm interested in doing that as well.

    How has your EFI and dampner/crank trigger ignition worked out?
    I'm a member of P.E.T.A.
    People Eating Tasty Animals
    There's no nookie like chinookie
    No butts like halibuts
    Fish are not our friends, they're food.
    Eat more moose - 10,000 wolves can't be wrong

    Life is sexually transmitted.

  3. #3

    Efi

    No progress on the EFI system - have been busy with other things over the summer. It's soon time to close the garage door and get back to it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Olympia WA
    Posts
    275
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Jyrki View Post
    I'd like to learn from other people's experience on lightening the stock crankshaft. What works and what doesn't? At some point Allleycat was in the process of modifying his 263 crank, but I haven't heard back. I was able to get a spare 320 short block that I'm going to build for serious power.
    First thing that can be done is stress relief the crank by removing all the forging marks and making a smooth surface like you would a connecting rod beam.
    In order to remove material from the counter weights the weight of the piston and rods need to be reduced so the crank can still be balanced. Good aluminum rods will work fine for street use and if you are wealthy use titanium. If you are changing the rods then both the 263 and 320 can be stroked 1/8th of an inch by going to smaller rod journals (2.0 for the 263 and 2.1 for the 320). If you can afford it you can stroke further by welding the journals and regrinding. If the journal moves out enough to expose the oil passage then the passage will need to be relocated.
    The 263 block will accommodate a 4.5 inch stroke with 2 inch rod journals.
    It will be difficult to make an after market rod big end small enough to pass through the stock bore diameter on the 263 (3.187) for engine assembly even with 2.0 journals and 5/16 inch bolts. Also the bottom of the bore would need to be notched to clear the rod beam for a large stroke. A larger bore solves both problems.
    The bore spacing on a 263 is as follows:

    3.725 Between 1 and 2, 3and 4, 5 and 6, 7and 8
    3.750 Between 2and 3, 6 and 7
    4.185 Between 4 and 5

    The block can be sleeved for a .200 overbore using a .125 thick sleeve and still have deck material and water jacket left between. With a bore and stroke of 3.387 x 4.5 your 263 becomes a 324.
    Doing the same for the 320 (3.637 x 4.5) and you have a 374.
    No one has forged rod blanks long enough so only billet rods are available.
    For our project Oliver was the cheapest at $1800 for a steel set. Aluminum should be around the same price but I'm not really sure.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    294
    Rep Power
    0
    I'm still out here! However, I've not been able to do much work on any of my car type projects. House projects MUST be done befor winter sets in, my shop must be upgraded in order to do some of these "out there" projects I've thought up, and there has been a coupla deaths in the family and I was executor on one and it takes a lot more time than I thought to get past all this!

    So, I'm still working on the 248 crank, and this is where I am. Nobody here or in California will touch the crank other than for minor refurbing. So I have to do it all myself. I have to make all the tooling and all the fixturing, this is just as big a job as lightning the crank itself. This is what I have determined about the crank in reguard to making it a LOT lighter. V8 cranks and str8 cranks are totaly different animals. A str8 crank has "perfect" balance. I don't like the word "perfect" because it can be very subjective, but in this case it works. Every throw arm, every rod journal, every everything is counterbalanced 180* away, so the only out of balance that will occure, is in the ammount of metal, more or less, that is in the rod journals. So, if it's all equal, it's in balance. It dos'ent matter how much or how little it is. The flyweights, the "pork choppy" chunks hanging off the opposite sides of the rod throws, are strictly there for the balance of the rod and piston, nothing more. So, keep the piston/rod assembly light, light is good, removing metal from the flyweight balances the piston/rod.

    I can JUST get the crank in my mill. It takes several drills progressing to about 2 ft long. The headstock is cranked to the point it will just hang on to the post. It's really close! I'm drilling a 1" hole through the rod journal, dead center. I think moving the hole outboard by about 1/8 or so, would have been better, but it's too late now, and things MUST be kept even. I'm about half way through the crank, then it must be fliped for the other end and some more tooling must be made. It's looking like the crank will weigh about 52 lbs when I'm done. A stock 248 crank is about 80 lbs, a 263 is close to 90 lbs, and I'm not sure what the 320 is. But with larger rod journals, and thus larger drilled holes, a similar weight reduction could be had. And, 30 lbs ain't small change. I'm even thinking that the throw arms could be ''I-beamed" but I'll leave that for later. Then! All the sharp edges must be radiused, oil supply tubes pressed in, grinding, polishing and all that "finishing" stuff, then the rod & mains got to be sized...Going to be a work of art! Unfortunatly, once it's in the engine, nobodys got a clue it's there....alleycat

  6. #6
    Hello guys and thanks for the input! I've been recently traveling, that's why it took so long to reply. Alleycat, I'd really like to see some pictures - I cannot imagine from where are you going to find such decrease in weight?

    Have any one of you tried to contour the counterweights - bullnosing, knife-edging etc?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    16
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Jyrki View Post
    Hello guys and thanks for the input! I've been recently traveling, that's why it took so long to reply. Alleycat, I'd really like to see some pictures - I cannot imagine from where are you going to find such decrease in weight?

    Have any one of you tried to contour the counterweights - bullnosing, knife-edging etc?

    There is no reason that you could not do this. On an inline engine the crankshaft is balanced by itself with no bobweights representing the rods and pistons. As long as you take equal amounts off the crankshaft counterweights front to rear, you should not throw the balance off so far that it isnt correctable by your engine balancer.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    327
    Rep Power
    0
    Jyrki,
    As for boring .200, it's both expensive and risky. With a turbocharged motor. The high cylinder pressures at the top can be disastrous especially if you have any hint of detonation. To put a .125 sleeve in, you have to remove almost .325 of material from the wall and you lose nearly all of the support from behind. Be safe and don't exceed .150 on an extreme application. We did all of the bore and stroke above, and we got two pass' on the block and had to coast through the last mile on the Salt to set a 169 record .[188 first pass, and 161 second pass coasting] Here's a picture of the result. More on the Salt Cat Racing Facebook page.
    Doug

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    327
    Rep Power
    0

    Crank Mods


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Olympia WA
    Posts
    275
    Rep Power
    0
    Doug
    In your case would you be willing to switch to alcohol then you could partially or completely fill the block so you can stay with the piston, rod and crank combination you already have?
    Never seen a piston and ring modification like that. Incredible!
    We run a filled 430 cu. in. V8 iron block, 1600 ft lbs of torque, 2400 HP, twin turbo on methanol.
    For street use your advice is best.
    The 263 block has much less cyclinder wall than the 320 (The 2 blocks I have measure .165).
    Paul
    Last edited by pmuller9; 10-21-2010 at 08:22 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. Oil system mods 320
    By handmedown40limited in forum Straight Eights!
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-13-2011, 06:00 PM
  2. Cheap Mods
    By BuboTheOwl in forum Tools, Shops, and Garages
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-04-2010, 07:21 PM
  3. 455 oil mods.
    By henryj11 in forum Big Block: 400, 430, 455
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-03-2010, 09:21 PM
  4. mods vs. resale value
    By Chitown skylark in forum Engine and Transmission Swaps
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-21-2008, 09:04 AM
  5. engine mods
    By hearseman in forum Straight Eights!
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-13-2004, 10:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
TeamBuick.com Privacy Policy